|
||||
| HONORS ECONOMICS UNIT OBJECTIVES | ||||
| UNIT ONE: Fundamentals of Economics | ||||
| unit objectives | ||||
|
In many ways, economics is management. Like any form
of management, it involves decision making. In this case, the primary
decisions we make concern the kinds of goods and services we want to
produce, the sorts of resources we’re willing to commit to producing
them, and the ways in which we want the resulting products and services
distributed.
Though we cannot all expect to share common values, we
can share a fundamental understanding of how economic variables
interrelate. It helps to have the facts: figures relating to
unemployment, poverty rates, interest rates, and inflation levels. It
also helps to have some insight regarding the ways economists use
economic models to attempt to predict the most probable economic
scenarios for our |
||||
|
||||
| UNIT TWO: The Market System | ||||
| unit objectives | ||||
|
As Adam Smith described, the price system is
very powerful in a market economy. To a great extent, it fulfills
the basic economic functions, determining what we produce and how,
as well as how many of these various goods and services each of us
is able to enjoy.
The relationship between firms and consumers is a complex one. In many ways, we as consumers are able to control the various markets, making our demands known by what we buy or ignore. At the same time, the value of our own resources—including the skills we have to sell as workers—is determined by the price system. In a complicated and fascinating way, we design our own economic fates, in part, by our very buying habits. |
||||
|
||||
| UNIT THREE: Supply and Demand | ||||
| unit objectives | ||||
|
The laws of Supply and Demand are the absolute fundamentals of
economics; as President John F. Kennedy once said: "Teach a parrot
to say 'supply and demand' and you'll have an economist." Supply and
Demand are tools for understanding a wide variety of specific issues
as well as the operation of the entire economic system.
|
||||
|
||||
| UNIT FOUR: Market Failure | ||||
| unit objectives | ||||
|
As Karl Marx pointed out no matter how powerful the price system is, it cannot resolve all our economic ills. Those with limited resources (whether money or skills) share few of the benefits of production. Others, through taxes, may fund a disproportionate share of public goods—those provided through government for all to use. And because of external economies and diseconomies, firms do not always realize profits proportionate to their investment of resources or their care in using resources wisely. Economists generally agree, therefore, that the price system cannot simply be left to its own devices. It must often be aided by government to ensure more equitable distribution of income and more judicious employment of resources. There are specific ways in which
government can and should intervene to correct for market failure. It is generally agreed that government should play a
major role in redistributing income to benefit the poor, providing
public goods like
national defense, and offsetting the effects of external economies and
diseconomies. There is great disagreement, however, regarding just how
far government should go. Conservatives tend to see too much government
interference as a real threat to personal freedom. Liberals counter that
the price system, left to itself, will simply not provide all the goods
and services that are socially desirable. Government provides many public goods and services:
national defense, highways, park services, and so forth. A public good
is something that can be consumed by one person without diminishing the
amount that can be consumed by others. Once such goods are produced or
provided, there is usually no way to prevent consumers from benefiting
from them, whether or not they contribute toward their cost. As a
result, public goods must be financed through the tax system. |
||||
|
||||
| UNIT FIVE: Public Choice | ||||
| unit objectives | ||||
|
Nobel Prize winning economist Milton Friedman pointed out that there are numerous problems related to government expenditures on public goods, including special interest groups and logrolling, the absence of the competitive discipline that private sector firms face, and the difficulty of determining how much and how many public goods will be produced. Public choice theorists tend to believe that government makes many decisions that are economically inefficient. For example, legislative policy may reflect the needs and pressures of special interest groups. Government agencies may operate in ways that are less efficient than comparable private corporations. And the voters’ capacity to express their views may be restricted by the fact that they must vote for one candidate and whatever “package” of programs or policies that candidate endorses. Government finances most of its expenses through taxes. The tax structure is based on two principles: first, that people who receive more from a service should pay more in taxes to support that service and, second, that people should be taxed in accordance with their income. Most people support these two principles. But, though useful, neither principle is specific enough to provide any real basis for a tax structure. The federal government gains most of its revenue through personal income taxes, state governments through sales and excise taxes, and local governments through property taxes. Some taxes, like the personal income tax, cannot be passed along. Others, like the property tax or the sales tax, can sometimes be passed from owner or producer to tenant or consumer. In the case of a sales or excise tax, the sensitivity of a product’s demand or supply to price will determine what portion of the tax is shifted from producer to consumer. In addition, imposition of a sales tax can reduce the equilibrium quantity of the good that is taxed. The current income tax in the United States is a progressive tax which takes more from the wealthy than from the poor. A regressive tax does the reverse, while a proportional tax takes a flat percentage from everyone. One alternative tax suggestion has been the negative income tax, a program under which families below a certain income level would receive payment from the government at tax time, rather than paying anything in. Thus far, the negative income tax program has not received sufficient support to be tried. |
||||
|
||||