| |
This week's assignment: The seventh
episode of "The Apprentice" began with Donald Trump doing a corporate
reorganization of the remaining 12 candidates. He broke up the men against
the women dynamic by asking each team's project manager to choose new teams
by first selecting whom they did not want on their team. The deck was
shuffled and the new teams were given the task of creating a "dog business"
to sell in New York's Central Park. Highest profits would determine the
winner.
In the boardroom
Mosaic's team chose a dog-washing service
at one location. They got off to a late start and failed to capitalize on
the prime dog-walking lunchtime hours. They posted a pathetic profit score
of $122 (my 11-year-old son could have done better). Apex diversified their
"dog makeovers" service, adding doggie massage with two locations, and put
$307 up on the scoreboard. Trump fired Mosaic loudmouth Stacy the debater,
telling her, "You are always complaining, and when you fail to sell your
idea, you blame Wes."
Wes scored a touchdown in this boardroom.
Finally a project manager takes a) the right people into the boardroom; and
b) clearly tells Trump the logic behind the decision. When asked by Trump
who he would take into the boardroom, he said Kelly and Sandy did a great
job, and since Maria had immunity, that left him with Andy and Stacy.
In a great strategic play in the
boardroom, Wes allowed Stacy to hang herself with Trump. My guess is that he
knew her mouth would succeed at this task. Wes refused to get caught up in
Stacy's emotional outbursts and didn't get hooked into her blaming, negative
rants.
|
Lessons Learned How to
Build a Cohesive Team
"In today's team-based organizations,
winning the respect and cooperation of colleagues and staff members is
critical if you want people to help you get things done. You need to
create a cohesive team and foster an environment of cooperation to
successfully complete complex and critical projects."
-
Consider the group's mission when selecting a team. Choose
team members who have performance capabilities that are best suited for
the task at hand--don't choose them based on existing relationships.
-
Put together a diverse team. Limiting the group to people
with similar interests and experiences will limit the final result.
Recruit individuals who represent a mix of viewpoints and perceptions.
Also, if support is needed from various parts of the organization,
select team members from these departments.
-
Identify the strengths of your team members. Ask members what
tasks they feel they are most suited to accomplish in the project. That
way when you delegate assignments you will know which members are best
equipped, and most eager, to perform them.
-
Be clear about member responsibilities. Good teams have a
multitude of complementary talents. Each person has strengths to bring
to the team effort. All the members need to understand what is expected
of them and what role they will play.
-
Focus, focus, focus. If you keep the unit pointed in the
right direction, members will have a clear sense of direction. You need
to communicate your team's vision each and every day and use it as a
behavioral guide. To help them link their everyday actions to the
vision, engage existing and new members in discussions about what
they're doing and why.
-
Make all members accountable for team results. When the team
is successful, they can share the glory; when the team is less than
successful, they must share the consequences.
-
Condition team members to believe they are part of a successful
group. Be certain members know that their team is made up of
winners, and that they wouldn't be there if they weren't winners, too.
Build esprit de corps by stressing team accomplishments.
-
Earn members' respect. People follow a leader they trust and
respect. Carry through on promises. If you say that you'll do something,
they want to know they can count on your word.
-
Get feedback about how to improve the team's performance. New
members can often see things more clearly than insiders. Even if you
disagree with member suggestions, let them know that you were glad to
hear their ideas.
PASS
-
Corporate restructure.
Trump made a wise decision to restructure the
companies. Although the women's team had begun to gel in the last
episode, they had clearly demonstrated an inability to collaborate
effectively. Change is inevitable. According to Price Pritchet, more
than half of all U.S. companies restructured in the 1990s. Leaders
must continually analyze how to structure their organizations and
teams to make the most of their potential. When conflict, plunging
profits or underperformance are issues, restructuring can be a good
option. One thing is for sure, companies that refuse to change and
adapt will be ill-equipped to succeed in this complex fast-paced
global marketplace.
-
Analyze strengths and weaknesses
of a new team. Jennifer, project
manager for the new restructured Apex team, began by asking her team
members to assess each other's strengths and weaknesses. Recognizing
she lacked a direct perspective of these new team members, she asked
them to assess each other to get an objective view. She then used this
information to place her team members in roles that played to their
strengths. Inevitably on teams, different personality types will
affect team performance. Wise leaders take the time to help team
members assess communication styles and preferences. This allows team
members an opportunity to understand where other team members are
coming from, particularly when conflict emerges. There are several
good assessment options for leaders and their teams to learn more
about each other's behavior styles and preferences, including the
Myers Briggs Type Indicator or the Thomas-Kilman conflict mode
instrument.
-
One bad apple can spoil the
entire box. Leaders of business or football
teams know that occasionally you have a rotten apple on the team --
someone with a bad attitude who is not a team player. Some people just
don't play well with others. Leaders can fail their teams by allowing
a bad apple's behavior bring down the morale and performance of the
entire team. There are times when leaders must make hard decisions.
Wes needed to get rid of Stacy. Her attitude had great potential to
destroy his team.
FAIL
-
Ownership.
Stacy was fired by Trump for her failure to take
responsibility for her inability to persuade others on her team. In
business and life, our ability to take responsibility and ownership
for our piece is important to resolving conflict and working
effectively with others.
-
Attitude, attitude, attitude.
Stacy's attitude had truly gone to the dogs.
In this episode, she barked that she "wasn't a dog person." She
doesn't appear to be a people person either. She constantly
complained, blamed everyone else, interrupts others, talks over
people, never took personal responsibility, debated everyone,
demonstrated she was a poor listener and lacked emotional
intelligence. Need I go on? Perhaps most important, she lacked the
most crucial component of business and leadership success: a positive
attitude. By the way, Chris' attitude stinks too. Instead of
offering better solutions, he bitterly dubbed his team's business
strategy as "frigging nuts" (he has such a way with words!) and
complained about the demeaning tasks he had to perform on dogs, "it
was so degrading." Instead of pumping the team up when their sales
were slowing down, Chris tells his team, "We're gonna lose." Would you
choose this man to lead your team to victory? Whatever happened to,
"When the going gets tough, the tough get going?" The true test of
leadership is performance in tough times, not just good times. Ivan
Misner, best selling-author of "Masters of Success," spoke before
business leaders of BNI (Business Networking International) in Seattle
about the importance of attitude to business success. People aren't
promoted who have lousy attitudes. One of the most important things to
assess in a potential new hire or new team member is attitude because
leaders can't effectively change an individual's core beliefs or
personality. Aptitude can be trained, attitude cannot.
-
What does your target market
value? Mosaic lost despite using
cause-related marketing by tying their profits to a charity. They
originally attempted to tie into a New York firefighters charity.
Cause-related marketing is a great way to show positive public
support, but to maximize this advantage the charity or cause should be
tied either to the product or the preferred charities of your target
market. Surprisingly, Mosaic selected "Kitty Kind," a cat charity that
lead to the greatest quip of the show by Trump, "The last thing dogs
want to know is that they are helping cats!" Trump has a sense of
humor after all!
-
Open learning.
Trump gave Stacy the feedback, but she still doesn't
get the ownership concept. After being fired, she was interviewed in
the taxi still determined to blame others. "Wes tried to pin our loss on me; I was trying to help him, but I have
learned a lot." Apparently not. The No. 1 lesson Stacy should have
learned from this experience is that she needs to take personal
responsibility and accept accountability. In the same breath that she
brags about her learning from the show, she gives us clear evidence
she really didn't get it. To succeed in business and leadership, being
an open learner is absolutely critical. Stacy proved she was unable to
learn from her mistakes. Stacy should go back to being a lawyer. But
wait, aren't lawyers also judged on their ability to persuade?
MAUREEN MORIARTY
SPECIAL TO THE SEATTLE POST-INTELLIGENCER
|
|
|